From The Trenches


By Ram Aiyar, CEO of Korro Bio, as part of the From The Trenches feature of LifeSciVC

It has been an extraordinary journey so far and one that continues to humble, inspire and motivate me every day. I’ve had the honor and responsibility of building a visi on that is ambitious while being grounded in scientific rigor. Over the last 4.5 years, Korro has been built by mitigating one layer of risk at a time. This has culminated in a strong team, a robust pipeline, a set of supportive investors, board members, and key opinion leaders.

2025 holds to be a transformative year for us, with the potential for multiple milestones to come to fruition, with the biggest value inflection being the interim clinical data from our lead asset KRRO-110, a potential best in class compound for patients with Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). To learn more about Korro Bio see here.

Founding Vision: Harnessing RNA Editing for Transformative Medicine

Korro Bio’s story began in 2018, co-founded by a remarkable group: Jean-François Formela, M.D. (Partner at Atlas) Nessan Bermingham Ph.D. (Founder and Ex-CEO of Intellia), Andrew Fraley, Ph.D. (Scientist entrepreneur), and Josh Rosenthal, Ph.D. (Academic specializing in RNA editing). Their collective expertise—spanning gene editing, venture creation, and foundational science—set the stage for building Korro. Josh’s work at the Marine Biological Laboratory unlocked the potential of utilizing an endogenous protein to make a single alphabet change on RNA (RNA editing), a process that was precise, reversible and had druglike characteristics. The ability of modifying RNA enabled us to sidestep many of the potential risks associated with permanent DNA editing. Andrew and Ness with the operational experience building companies, pulled together the foundation and demonstrated with preliminary data the concept of using an oligonucleotide to enable RNA editing. Atlas Venture and NEA were early believers, incubating Korro Bio and providing the initial capital and strategic support needed to turn this vision into reality.

Building medicines by activating biological pathways

As I joined the Company in Q4 2020 as its CEO, I had a vision of creating protein variants to activate biological pathways. This ability to activate pathways could be possible for almost all proteins, however the biggest differentiation was to consider areas that were hard to drug – transcription factors, ion channels, intracellular proteins, etc. This concept of effecting a protein change. was based on experience building on the understanding that a single protein variant, could have markedly different outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease.

From the outset, our mission was clear: to discover, develop, and commercialize a new class of therapies that could impact a broad range of diseases, both rare and prevalent. Our goal was to do provide a paradigm of activating biological pathways in a highly targeted manner. We aimed to achieve this by modifying and modulating proteins by precisely changing a single alphabet on RNA with the use of an oligonucleotide (think short stretches of chemically modified RNA or DNA). We intended to learn from nature (genetics) and use pharmaceuticals properties to drive patient benefit. We built our proprietary OPERA™ platform (here), leveraging oligonucleotide guided RNA editing to modulate protein expression.

We could not get into prevalent diseases from the outset, as taking on the risk of novel technology in a large indication compounded the risk increasing risk of failure. If something were to go wrong along the way, we would have taken too much capital and would not have known why we failed. As I wore my engineering hat, the most prudent way was to modify one variable at a time, and control known variables.

Removing Risk, Each step of the Way, Step by Step

How does one work on novel science, continue to have confidence in the path taken and generate sufficient evidence to create value and therefore enable a financing? Every biotech journey is a lesson in humility, especially when working on novel mechanisms and novel science.

One of the first important decisions was to choose an indication. Alpha-1 Antitrypsin deficiency was selected based on unmet need and scientific rationale (video).

  • Big unmet medical need – Needing to solve two problems at a time
    • too much bad protein in the liver, not enough good protein in the lung
  • By repairing the protein in the liver, we could simultaneously solve two biological problems with one approach
  • Multiple ways to deliver the drug to the liver with the precedence of approved drug products
  • Ability to know if the mechanism works patients in the first clinical study as the repaired protein would go from non-existent to high levels
  • We will likely know if we have a drug in the first study in less than 30 patients

To ensure we would work in this setting early, we ran the first experiment with a fully synthetic oligonucleotide encapsulated in a Lipid Nano Particle (LNP) in the gold standard PiZZ mouse model for AATD showing low double digit editing with high specificity and correlating protein expression. The experiment worked and showed the precision of RNA editing.

It was a time where “platforms” were in vogue, talent jumped shipped often, people working from home during COVID and all the while working towards developing a clinical candidate. It was hard, and I was not entirely successful, but changing the mindset of much of the company from a technology focused company to a drug development entity required focus.

Next, capital allocation and company build rested on the question of whether the concept of making an amino acid change in protein was relevant biologically and how we would generate that evidence. We assembled a group of consultants, key opinion leaders, experienced drug hunters, and charged them with the question:

  • Find a known target where biology was well known, but traditionally undruggable and identify points of differentiation in specific diseases
  • In addition, demonstrate feasibility with 3 – 6 months with external resources

Within 6 months, this motley crew of non-FTEs, was able to generate preliminary evidence that the concept of changing an amino acid to activate biological pathways is possible, and repeatable across multiple targets. It also built credibility to the fact that we were not focused on Mendelian disease to ONLY repair a protein that was mutated due to a defect on the DNA, but rather learning from genetics and modifying an existing protein that is functional. Knowing that we can go after multiple targets, we set out to iterate on the compounds to create increasingly potent molecules. The investment into building a “platform” that could generate multiple assets, was starting to become real. This process has led to us building a robust pipeline.

Knowing that the siRNA and ASO gapmer field  (here) went through iterations in potency and delivery, with a novel mechanism we wanted to ensure success with the first compounds in the clinic. This meant focusing on clinical benefit for patients with AATD and build a drug candidate profile that was meaningful for patients.

What is the clinical need:

  • AATD patients needed to get to at least heterozygous levels of protein (~50% of all RNA transcripts modified leading to “normal” protein)
  • infrequent dosing
  • Generate evidence that this mechanism and specifically this drug candidate will work in humans

Risks:

  • If activity is not demonstrated in humans, is it because the drug candidate did not get to the right place in the cell (cytoplasm or nucleus) OR is the mechanism not working?
  • Is it more important to have a clinical meaningful drug candidate OR convenience? Standard of care for patients with AATD is once-a- week infusion.

We thus picked an LNP to move forward, to ensure drug was in the right compartment at high concentrations and not stuck inside an ineffective compartment. We removed a layer of risk by picking an LNP after running experiment with multiple vendors which had the right profile for us (high animal safety Index, and evidence that the LNP had been in humans with a good profile). Additionally, we confirmed using tool compounds that the mechanism has a high probability of working in humans (translational studies in mice and monkeys). Finally, we only nominated the development candidate KRRO-110 after running several safety studies in rodents and monkeys. We were able to do this by generating another round of private financing in Series B and finally taking the “not-frequently-travelled-path” of undergoing a merger, a public listing and a private financing ALL at the same time (reverse merger). This meant keeping a focus on the scientific team on the ambitious goals, focusing the finance and legal team on the multiple transactions, educating the investor and analyst community on the potential of our data, and navigating the ever-evolving competitive landscape.

Generating clinical data in patients is one of the most meaningful value inflection points. We would not be here were it not for an excellent board, scientific advisors, and a team focused on execution AND individual sacrifices to accomplish the impossible. It has never been easy, we have not always had all the resources we needed, and I am extremely proud and grateful for the team to “Say what we are going to do and Doing what we said we would”.  We have stuck to our timelines that we laid out in ’22.

But great science means little without great people that we have had the pleasure to being at Korro – scientists, clinicians, operators, and culture-builders who bring both expertise and heart. Thankful for each of the individuals that have contributed to getting us to where we are today.

What I have learned putting all of it together (outside of GPT) and with my other 6 companies

  • Have a bold vision that is uniquely yours (and aligned with the BoD)
  • Plan for 5 – 10 years ahead with building the market-product fit for each asset
  • Build the company to increase PoS (taking layers of risk off at a time) with each financing
  • Decide early before capital formation, are you a single asset company or more
  • Meaningful clinical data is the single most value creating event for a biotech (try to get it done in the first trial)
  • There are easier ways to make money than being in a Biotech – make sure you are in it for the patients (anything else will pale in comparison)
  • People in the end are what matter through the journey (colleagues, BoD members, investors, KOLs, SAB members, competitors and most importantly the patients)

The Road Ahead: Grandeur with Humility

Our ambition remains as grand as ever—to rewrite the future of medicine, one RNA edit at a time. We have laid out an ambitious 3-2-1 strategy to get three clinical assets, across two tissue types with a single platform through 2027. We approach this mission with humility, knowing that each step forward is earned through teamwork, learning, an unwavering focus on patients and generating evidence along the way.

These are exciting times for us at Korro, and the field in general! Despite the external market environment, as long as we generate hope for patients and provide an option to transform their lives, everyone at Korro is excited on the possibilities of RNA editing and the potential benefit it can bring for patients.

To everyone who has joined, invested in, advised, or supported Korro Bio: thank you for believing in this vision and for driving it forward with passion and integrity. The journey is far from over, and I’m honored to continue building this organization alongside you.

 

Certain statements in this blog may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, express or implied statements regarding expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies of Korro regarding the future including, without limitation, express or implied statements regarding execution of the 3-2-1 strategy, among others. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that, while considered reasonable are inherently uncertain. Nothing herein should be regarded as a representation by any person that the forward-looking statements set forth herein will be achieved or that any of the contemplated results of such forward-looking statements will be achieved.

 

Comment





By Arthur Tzianabos, CEO of Lifordi Immunotherapeutics, as part of the From The Trenches feature of LifeSciVC

It’s easy to jump on the ‘negative bandwagon’ these days when news in our world and industry is focused on doom & gloom. In biotech, headlines and daily conversations lean heavily toward company layoffs, shutdowns, pipeline pare-backs, regulatory setbacks, depressed valuations, and what feels like impossible situations. Whether it’s inside companies, boardrooms, research institutions, healthcare organizations, investment firms, banks, real estate offices, manufacturing hubs or conference panels and hallways, the beat down is palpable and contagious.

Today’s uncertainty, including economic policy shifts, financial challenges, and perceived regulatory hurdles, can be scary. It appears that many of us are allowing or perpetuating negativity. This is perfectly normal since we are human and are wary of job security or the inability to raise money to fund our companies. However, I fear that if we continue to embrace a pessimistic view, we risk creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. This will not serve us or our patients well.

Understandably, rapid, and recent changes in government policy and personnel create uncertainty, but this isn’t new. Anxiety in 2017 over NIH and FDA appointments preceded some of the strongest years of approvals, revenue, and funding. Moreover, we know and plan for development timelines that span multiple administrations, which means we must continue to focus on good science and prudent business operations.

Although the stakes seem higher today, the fundamentals of the biotech industry and the key ingredients for success have not changed. The biotech recipe still calls for a healthy mix of:

1) Credible science/promising drug candidate(s)

2) Experienced management

3) High unmet medical needs/commercial opportunity

4) Access to capital

We have experienced periods in the past when one or more of these essential ingredients have been difficult to procure and maintain. Even then, biotech companies launched new medicines, important scientific discoveries advanced to the clinic, treatments obtained regulatory approval and patients, investors and society benefited.

Today, we can still check these boxes…..

Scientific discoveries are flowing

New mechanisms of action (MOAs), new targets, modalities and approaches abound and are helping many more patients today

  • Biologics and targeted therapies include new cytokine targets and bispecific antibodies. We welcome innovative CAR-Ts, GLP-1 receptor agonists, PD-1 inhibitors and others that have been approved, are in development or waiting to be discovered.

Good data is being rewarded

  • Positive Phase 2 clinical data in head and neck cancer reported by Merus N.V. resulted in a rise in stock price from ~$40 to $62+ over the past several weeks
  • Hot off the press is Kymera Therapeutics’ Phase 1 healthy volunteer data for its first-in-class oral STAT6 degrader which resulted in an impressive ~45+% jump in stock price on the news
  • And this just in: Lyra Therapeutics’ positive Phase 3 results in the treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS), which drove the stock up ~400% on the announcement

Pipelines/programs founded on novel science that have had to be shelved for now doesn’t necessarily mean that they will no longer see the light of day. Opportunistic pharma and savvy investors may still seize the day and give some of these promising breakthroughs a new home when the time is right.

Management teams have gained valuable experience

Industry leaders have weathered a number of storms now, some of which have been more severe and lasted longer than others. Nimble, open-minded, and experienced management teams have taken important lessons forward. They’ve become more adept at building and contracting, keeping their options open, and pivoting when necessary. The best ones have also learned how and when to ask for help, leveraging the strong relationships that our biotech community is founded upon.

That is not to say that there aren’t opportunities to learn how to operate more efficiently. Assessing outsourcing strategies, particularly early on and in times of economic pressure, has become an art to successfully advancing the science. Knowing what key functions can be served from afar and those that must be integrated within is often company and time dependent. Experienced teams will lean toward staying lean while generating data as quickly as possible because cash is king.

Unmet medical needs remain high

One indicator of high unmet need is the number of clinical trials listed and currently underway. According to ClinicalTrials.gov, there are over 500,000 registered studies including interventional and observational studies. Not all of these studies are active or currently recruiting, but over the past five years, more than 35,000 studies have been registered annually. In 2024, BioSpace reported that the U.S. had 20,465 ongoing clinical trials, and worldwide there were 65,474 trials recruiting subjects. Unmet needs remain high and drugs that demonstrate clear benefits for patients will continue to attract pharma partners, strategic investments, and buyers.

Capital is available

There is significant capital that is yet to be invested. According to data from Cambridge Associates and Pitchbook, private equity and venture capital funds are sitting on around $1.7 trillion of committed, but not yet invested capital. This includes nearly $140 billion raised in 2019 or 2020 and an additional $200 million from 2021, some of which could also hit the end of its investment period this calendar year. Keeping in mind that most funds have five years to build their portfolios, critical allocation decisions will need to be made in the near term.

Investors have additional money to deploy

By mid-May, Life Sciences issuers raised approximately $8 billion in equity-based deals (including IPOs, CMPOs, Follow-Ons, Bought Deals, Convertible Note offerings, PIPEs and RDs and this does not include Preferred Offerings and ATMs). Private financings from 2025 also indicate that deals are getting done.

Select private financings from 2025

In this environment, investors will continue to be conservative and disciplined regarding the companies they invest in. Management teams will need to be even more results-driven and efficient with their dollars. This is a good thing. Companies with the right ingredients that also take a conservative and disciplined approach can succeed. Low valuations won’t last forever and while here, they offer opportunities for smart, discerning, and patient investors to reap potentially greater ROI.

As the biotech sector rebounds from the funding downturn, capital is now being more selectively allocated to high-quality, data-driven programs.” – 3rd Annual BioConnect Conference, H.C. Wainwright & Co., Investor Panel

Pharma has money to spend 

The advent of COVID vaccines contributed to record global drug revenues, and the new obesity drugs appear to be following suit.With trillions of dollars in revenues, R&D reductions, pipelines in need of expansion, and a bevy of patent expirations that are drawing even closer, Pharma needs to be active. As of mid-May 2025, Life Sciences M&A transactions represented ~$30 billion of announced value. SMID-cap M&A activity is expected to accelerate in 2025 presuming a favorable regulatory environment as the pharmaceutical sector hunts for new pipeline assets. Four public and three private M&A deals with consideration greater than $500 million were announced.

Biotech clearly has assets that provide value to pharma’s pipelines, and one could expect to see a bolus of M&A deals over the next 3-6+ months. As competition for the most promising assets and companies intensifies, biotechs who have demonstrated meaningful progress and generated compelling data should command better economics.

FDA continues to approve therapies, and the industry is experiencing success in commercial launches with more to come. Recent drug approvals include:

It is worth noting that Verastem’s approval is the first for a rare ovarian cancer and the first-ever oral combination of two novel drugs in oncology. Abeona’s approval represents the first and only cell-based gene therapy for a debilitating derm condition –and with a single treatment. These are significant milestones for both patients and for the biotech industry.

Eli Lilly’s Zepbound, a drug approved for chronic weight management in adults, generated over $2 billion in revenue for 1Q 2025, which represented an increase of $517.4 million over the same period last year. Drugs still anticipated to launch in 2025 include:

So, with all this good news, why do biotech surveys, analyst and industry reports, and general, trade and social media keep harping on the negative?

Perhaps they have forgotten that over the past 5-10 years an unprecedented number of biotech companies have launched, and a considerable number of these also completed initial public offerings (IPOs) at much earlier stages in their development (preclinical stages). These biotechs must report their progress, as well as any setbacks, on a frequent basis. As a result, they are unveiling initial data and having it play out in the public markets vs. in a private company setting. How often does a small, early clinical data set knock it out of the park in safety and efficacy? Very rarely. Depending on the PK/PD of a drug and the indication, early data readouts can be meaningful. More often than not, the data are mixed, open to interpretation and needing more patients to demonstrate clinical proof of concept and an attractive safety and efficacy profile.

It’s no wonder that patience is wearing thin. During the pandemic, COVID vaccines were approved in record time and with Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) came the idea that future treatments might also reach patients sooner than ever before. Breakthrough Designations, Fast Tracks, RMATs and Accelerated Approvals have been major advancements, but developing new drugs and obtaining approval is still a long, winding, and expensive road.

Instead of fueling the fire, this is an opportunity for us to reassess what we are doing, how we are doing it, and why we are doing it.

We are developing innovative therapies as quickly and efficiently as possible to help patients who need new treatment options.

It’s time to get off the negative bandwagon and keep our focus on what we do well, what we could do better and what we believe is possible. With the BIO International Convention just around the corner, let’s regroup, reset, and hop on board a positive bandwagon. To inspire this view, I share some recent quotes from investors and industry veterans that I believe deserve more of the spotlight:

…now we should focus on rebuilding, not dwelling on things we cannot control but learning from them.” –Paul Hastings from the Endpoints 100 Biotech Survey

“If we give into the negative sentiment, it’s like giving up… and that’s not what we do, it’s not how we are built, and it’s why we survive.” –Longtime CEO and VC

  And I thought this one summed it up nicely:

“This is possibly the greatest moment in biotech if you can see through the current headwinds. Valuations are attractive for efficient biotechs with good drug candidates, smart management teams, and supportive investors. Focus on areas of unmet need…and develop it cheaply and quickly. It CAN be done. Dare.” –Investor at BioConnect Conference, H.C. Wainwright

Hopefully, I have made a case for why we need to shift our collective mindset to a positive mode. We have a lot of great science being discovered every day and the knowledge and experience to translate it into impactful drugs for diseases where patients have few, if any, treatments available.

WE GOT THIS……LFG!

 

Comment